We need vitamin D because it increases our intestinal absorption of calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus and makes our bones strong. We get most of the vitamin through a synthesis that occurs on our skin. The synthesis is a complicated process involving a chemical that resides in our skin combined with exposure to the sun (ultraviolet light). (Vitamin D is found in only a few foods, such as egg yolks, oily fish and milk fortified with vitamin D.) Because many people have little exposure to sunlight, especially those living
in northern areas in the winter, some investigators became concerned that large
swaths of the population were not getting enough of the vitamin.
In 2007, one influential doctor published a paper asserting that
blood levels of vitamin D below 29 nanograms per milliliter of blood leads to
an increased risk of cancer, autoimmune disease, diabetes, schizophrenia,
depression, poor lung capacity and wheezing. (He’s also published books.) Word
got around and soon “there was a vitamin D bandwagon,” in the words of Mayo
Clinic doctor. Doctors began incorporating vitamin D tests into the general
evaluation of patients. Commercial labs immediately began describing levels of 20
to 30 nanograms as insufficient (and many continue to do so). The number of
blood tests for vitamin D among Medicare beneficiaries increased 83-fold from
2000 to 2010. Among those with commercial insurance, testing rates rose
2.5-fold from 2009 to 2014.
In the meantime, a number of scientists performed multiple
studies to verify the doctor’s claim, which turned out not to be true. After conducting
many trials with thousands of test subjects, scientists found that those who
took vitamin D supplements were no better off than those who took placebos. After reviewing the studies, the Institute of
Medicine prepared a report stating that there’s no benefit for healthy people
to have blood levels above 20 nanograms of vitamin D per milliliter of blood. After
becoming convinced that the tests weren’t necessary, one doctor tried to
discourage her patients from being tested. But, she said, “people were used to
vitamin D monitoring, like with cholesterol. They wanted to know what their
number is.”
There’s no reason to be tested for vitamin D, even if you
live in Maine. It’s just another unnecessary test.
For an introduction to this blog, see I Just Say No; for a list of blog topics, click the Topics tab.
No comments:
Post a Comment