If you read The New York Times, you may have already seen this article: “Are You Aging Well? Try These Simple Tests to Find Out.” A challenge!
To keep my posts
short (and provide material for four posts), I’m going to describe one of these
tests per post, along with my test results. Here is the first test:
Go
from standing to sitting on the floor, and back up again, using the least
amount of support as possible.
Here’s a link to a video showing a man (in his 20s?) doing the test. CLINIMEX: Sitting-rising test (SRT) - an updated 2025 video . On the first try he uses one hand. On the second try he doesn't. (It’s in Portuguese or something, but there are captions.)
The
test is scored on a 10-point scale—5 points for sitting down and 5 points
for getting up. You lose a point for every hand, knee or other body part you
use to help yourself.
My result: I used both hands and both knees to get down to the floor and the same for getting up, so I lost 8 points, giving me a score of 2. (First, I got down to my hands and knees to sit down, then I got back onto my hands and knees to stand up.) Pitiful score, but hey, I got down and up!
Supposedly this test is a predictor of mortality. A study that looked at more than 4,000 people, aged 46 to 75, found that, over the course of 12 years, the people who scored 4 or below had death rates nearly four times higher than those who scored a 10. Apparently, that’s because people with low scores were at a higher risk for falls.
What if, like me, you’re 89? Isn’t my 2 worth something? Evidence of life?
For an introduction to this blog, see I Just Say No; for a list of blog topics, click the Topics tab.
I could do all those moves until my late 70s, but it's too much for me now in my 90s, Aging well? The definition is too vague.
ReplyDeleteThat is hysterical!
ReplyDeleteGetting down and up again at 89 is worth a Gold Star. That's good enough for me.