If you read The New York Times, you may have already seen this article: “Are You Aging Well? Try These Simple Tests to Find Out.” A challenge!
To keep my posts
short (and provide material for four posts), I’m going to describe one of these
tests per post, along with my test results. Here is the first test:
Go
from standing to sitting on the floor, and back up again, using the least
amount of support as possible.
Here’s a link to a video showing a man (in his 20s?) doing the test. CLINIMEX: Sitting-rising test (SRT) - an updated 2025 video . On the first try he uses one hand. On the second try he doesn't. (It’s in Portuguese or something, but there are captions.)
The
test is scored on a 10-point scale—5 points for sitting down and 5 points
for getting up. You lose a point for every hand, knee or other body part you
use to help yourself.
My result: I used both hands and both knees to get down to the floor and the same for getting up, so I lost 8 points, giving me a score of 2. (First, I got down to my hands and knees to sit down, then I got back onto my hands and knees to stand up.) Pitiful score, but hey, I got down and up!
Supposedly this test is a predictor of mortality. A study that looked at more than 4,000 people, aged 46 to 75, found that, over the course of 12 years, the people who scored 4 or below had death rates nearly four times higher than those who scored a 10. Apparently, that’s because people with low scores were at a higher risk for falls.
What if, like me, you’re 89? Isn’t my 2 worth something? Evidence of life?
For an introduction to this blog, see I Just Say No; for a list of blog topics, click the Topics tab.
I could do all those moves until my late 70s, but it's too much for me now in my 90s, Aging well? The definition is too vague.
ReplyDelete