In
a study last year of 200 patients, all of whom had one profoundly blocked
coronary artery and severe chest pain, half the patients received stents and
the other half received a sham operation. Both groups received medications,
such as for high blood pressure. The result: those who got the sham procedure did just
as well as those who got the stents. In an editorial published in Lancet along with the study results, Dr.
Rita A. Redberg, of the University of California, San Francisco, commented that
stents should be used only for people who are having heart attacks. Other
doctors agree. (There’s general agreement that stents can be lifesaving for
patients in throes of a heart attack. In 2002, my husband had a stent implanted
under this circumstance.)
Stents have long been controversial. A 2007 study of 2,300 patients with symptoms of clogged arteries showed that stents did not prevent heart attacks or deaths from heart disease. In this study, all the patients had a relatively stable form of coronary artery disease that generally progresses slowly—the situation with most Americans who receive stents. Similar studies have consistently shown that stents have no advantages over a medications-only regimen. Ditto angioplasty. (Stents generate nearly $3 billion a year in sales in the United States for Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson, the two companies that dominate the market. Inserting them costs from $11,00 to $41,000. Husband's bill was $105K.)
Stents have long been controversial. A 2007 study of 2,300 patients with symptoms of clogged arteries showed that stents did not prevent heart attacks or deaths from heart disease. In this study, all the patients had a relatively stable form of coronary artery disease that generally progresses slowly—the situation with most Americans who receive stents. Similar studies have consistently shown that stents have no advantages over a medications-only regimen. Ditto angioplasty. (Stents generate nearly $3 billion a year in sales in the United States for Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson, the two companies that dominate the market. Inserting them costs from $11,00 to $41,000. Husband's bill was $105K.)
My
husband is now treading without pain. Still, if/when I’m in his shoes, I’m going
to say no to stenting. At least that’s my plan.
For an introduction to this blog, see I Just Say No; for a list of blog topics, click the Topics tab.
For an introduction to this blog, see I Just Say No; for a list of blog topics, click the Topics tab.
No comments:
Post a Comment