In last week’s post I mentioned that various types of scans and
x-rays can be both dangerous and of no value. Of course, often they are needed
for diagnostic purposes—but often they’re not. The following is a summary of
what the March 15, 2015 issue of Consumer
Reports offers as guidelines for making decisions about getting scans or
x-rays.
Four scans you can usually skip:
Cancers from medical radiation can take anywhere from five
to 60 years to develop. Children are particularly vulnerable to the effects of
radiation. Those who had a CT scan before the age of five face a 35 percent
spike in cancer risk. For every 1,000 children who have an abdominal CT scan,
one will develop cancer as a result. A 2012 study that looked at almost 180,000
British children linked CT scans to higher rates of leukemia and brain cancer.
Dr.Stephen J. Swensen, M.D., medical director at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester,
Minnesota says, “All too often children are receiving adult-sized doses of
radiation, which is many times the amount they need. The dose directly
increases the risk of leukemia or a solid tumor. And that’s not regulated
today.” A friend of mine developed cancer of the salivary gland which she
suspects (with good evidence) was caused by X-ray treatments for acne she
received as a teenager over 50 years ago.
As to X-rays on your teeth (the bitewing type), you need one
only every 24 to 36 months, and you can go a decade between full-mouth x-rays.
Well, this is scary business. Best to be skeptical when it
comes to getting scans.
Next week: Mammograms: Just say no
For an introduction to this blog, see I Just Say No; for a list of blog topics, click the Topics tab.
For an introduction to this blog, see I Just Say No; for a list of blog topics, click the Topics tab.
No comments:
Post a Comment